EQUATORIAL GUINEA – República de Guinea Ecuatorial, République de Guinée Équatoriale

January 6th , 2011 → 6:46 pm @


File:Equatorial Guinea-location.jpg
The National Arms of Equatorial Guinea The National Flag Location

Administrative division

Equatorial Guinea is divided into seven provinces (capitals appear in parentheses):

  1. Annobón Province (San Antonio de Palé)
  2. Bioko Norte Province (Malabo)
  3. Bioko Sur Province (Luba)
  4. Centro Sur Province (Evinayong)
  5. Kié-Ntem Province (Ebebiyín)
  6. Litoral Province (Bata)
  7. Wele-Nzas Province (Mongomo)

The provinces are further divided into districts and municipalities.

As far as I know none of the provinces, districts. cities or municipalities uses heraldic arms.

Category : Travel

The Top 10: What to Do in Equatorial Guinea

January 6th , 2011 → 6:41 pm @

1. Malabo: The small but striking capital city abounds in Spanish colonial architecture and pleasant open plazas. The bustling market and the Spanish Colonial Center are worth a visit.

2. Climbing Volcanoes: The spectacular Pico Malabo volcano is an easy day trip from the city of Malabo. Arrange an expedition to take in its breathtaking views.

3. Beaches: The area around the mainland city of Bata boasts several beautiful and undeveloped beaches. Those at Mbini, just 32 miles south of Bata, are particularly gorgeous.

4. Local Liquors: Malamba, made from sugarcane, and osang, a type of African tea, are the national drinks. Locally brewed beer and palm wine are also abundant.

5. Market Shopping: Markets can be found in most cities and towns. In addition to local produce, bush meat, and textiles, many markets feature local handicrafts.

6. Monte Alen National Park: This park’s tropical forests are home to gorillas, elephants, chimpanzees, and many other creatures. Hire a local villager for a guided day trek through the park’s 1,400 kilometers of rain forest.

7. Bata Nightlife: This mainland city may feel small by day, but its nightlife is impressive. Be prepared for a long night;nightclubs typically don’t get going until quite late and are still jumping in the wee hours.

8. Moca Valley: Situated in the southern highlands of Bioko Island, this valley is home to the indigenous Buki people and offers plenty in the way of hiking and flora sightseeing.

9. Annobon: Head to the island of Annobon to see three of the country’s most famous mountain peaks, Pico del Fuega, Pico Centro, and Pico Surtado. Pico Surtado, the southernmost peak, is an inactive volcano whose crater now contains an impressive lake.

10. Arena Blanca: If you visit during the summer, Arena Blanca is a must-see. Its white-sand beaches are dazzling and enjoyable year-round. They literally come alive in the summertime with thousands of butterflies that nest there seasonally.

Category : Travel

New long haul routes for Birmingham travellers

December 29th , 2010 → 7:12 pm @

Dec 27 2010 by Edward Stephens, Birmingham Mail

FOURTEEN new long-haul routes and more frequent connections from Birmingham will mean more choice for Midland travellers next year.

Air France has linked up with airline Flybe to offer six daily flights from Birmingham to Paris’s Charles De Gaulle airport to connect with the new long-haul destinations.

These include Bata in Equatorial Guinea, Phnom Penh in Cambodia, Freetown in Sierra Leone and Monrovia in Liberia. Half of passengers flying from Birmingham to Paris take onward flights.

Read More http://www.birminghammail.net/news/birmingham-news/2010/12/27/new-long-haul-routes-for-birmingham-travellers-97319-27890161/#ixzz19YqMNaqj

Category : Travel

Thoughts on the UNSECO Obiang Prize

November 14th , 2010 → 10:00 pm @

Another view of the controversy surrounding the UNESCO Obiang Prize.

Most recently, as part of Equatorial Guinea’s efforts to improve health in the country and promote scientific research on the African Continent, President Obiang announced the donation of USD$3.0 million from the Government of Equatorial Guinea to the World Health Organization, as well as the allocations of a headquarters facility for the organization to expand its work in the country. President Obiang also recently signed an agreement with the African Union for the creation and installation of the first Headquarters of the African Centre for Science, Technology and Innovation in Equatorial Guinea.

Recently, the UNESCO OBIANG Prize has come under attacks from western countries and mainly western vocal human rights organizations, requesting that Prize be withdrawn. Under such growing incomprehensible pressure, the organization’s executive board met in Paris and decided to put the award on hold “…and continue consultations among all parties concerned, in a spirit of mutual respect and until a consensus is reached.”

The UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences, named after the President of Equatorial Guinea, was created in 2008 and aims to reward the projects and activities of individuals, institutions or other entities for research that improves the quality of human life.

The prize is designed to be an annual accolade, with up to three laureates chosen each year and granted $300,000 between them, and focuses on efforts to find remedies or solutions to major illnesses and pandemics.

It should  be recalled that a taskforce was established by the UNESCO Director General Mrs. Irina Bokova to review all 43 current UNESCO prizes after the row over the Obiang prize erupted. The group delivered an internal report last September that failed to mention the prize as one that needed to be reconsidered.

Furthermore, it said that:  “there are inherent difficulties in assessing the integrity of the private or individual donor” as requested by UNESCO’s own internal rules on prizes, adding that “there is no specific procedure applied when the integrity of a private or individual donor of a UNESCO prize comes into question”.

Much of noise comes from “democratic” developed countries and their vocal Human Rights organizations, many of which are complaining that Equatorial Guinea is not “democratic enough” (according to their own subjective concepts of democracy), and is not respecting human rights.

About this line of criticism, a Swedish politician made the following comments: “The hypocrisy is so thick you could cut with a knife. In fact, that position does not prevent those countries from fighting for business economic opportunities in Equatorial Guinea; some defending turf, others trying desperately to get in”.

What is sad about the whole situation is that some developing countries are blindly following this unfounded and selfish outcry of those developed countries. How often have we seen some of those developed countries blocking their contributions to the annual budget of different UN Agencies including UNESCO, for the simple reason that on a given issue, the institution has followed the view of the majority of its members instead of that of the developed country concerned?

What should we make of the attitude of western countries and western human rights organizations? More cynical is the fact that, 2 years ago, the concerns being raised now were not discussed; and the executive board accepted Equatorial Guinea’s proposal for a prize. It is difficult to believe that member states didn’t think about these issues when they took that decision.

The pity is that this  prize has such potential to lessen the suffering of people worldwide, and particularly in developing countries including Africa. It is to help research in areas that affect humanity, such as HIV, malaria, and other endemic diseases. It is known that the jury had already met and chosen winners from Africa, Latin America, and the Arab states, essentially from developing countries. What message is it being sent by  blocking the whole thing? Is it because the winners are from developing countries?

The pity is that this  prize is to help research in areas that affect humanity, such as HIV, malaria, and other endemic diseases; and these are the domains which are the focus of any considered and respectable international NGO.

While some go so far as to question with cynicisms the source of the funding President Obiang pledged for the UNESCO prize, no one questions the source of resources that many developed countries‘ companies operating in Equatorial Guinea are transferring daily back to their countries and on which they are paying taxes to their respective governments.

If there were so much misery in Equatorial Guinea, why are those NGOs screaming for human rights violations not there to help on humanitarian grounds?

A respectable Canadian politician also asked the following question: “would the same concerns be raised if such contribution was from an individual from a western country”?

The United States, by putting forward a resolution to the 58-nation executive board  calling for the withdrawal of the prize, has ignored the widespread support for the prize by African and Arab delegations to UNESCO who stated that such moves, including the US resolution, will only delay the prize further, rather than lead to its withdrawal.

The United States, contrary to its habits, did not approach the discussion in a spirit of mutual respect for the African countries, and did not show the proof of its commitment to the goal of building scientific capacity in Africa as often stated by Secretary of States Hillary Clinton; which is regrettable.

Even U.S. Senator Leahy, (Chairman of the Senate Sub-Committee responsible for appropriating money to the State Department for UNESCO) who wrote to UNESCO in May 2010 in protest was definitely ill advised and did not even bother to travel or send his aids to Equatorial Guinea where EXXON has the monopoly of oil exploitation (which some European countries depict as a “scandal” in fair trade) to find the truth.

An Arab delegation to UNESCO even raised the question whether the value of a proposal is based on the relative power of who submits it or on its unbiased analytical foundation and the number of those supporting it, independently of their origins. This legitimate and pertinent question could not be answered by the UNESCO Administration.

China recently funded the UNESCO Asia Pacific Program for Educational Innovation for Development (APEID) award, known as the UNESCO-APEID Wenhui Award for Educational Innovation, which was to announce its first winner last  October. Why didn’t the United States put forward a resolution calling for the withdrawal of Award funded by China? Maybe the Nation-State interest were too high?

  • Why didn’t the western countries and the those vocal human rights organizations opposed the award?
  • Why didn’t the UNESCO establishment adopt the same attitude vis a vis the Award funded by China?
  • Why did the Western countries and their Human Rights organizations  openly accepted the  L’Oreal-UNESCO Awards for Women in Science prize, whose founder Liliane Bettencourt was involved in a corruption probe involving an alleged massive tax rebate in France?

As stated by a delegate from Asia echoing an African delegate, “consideration of any facet of the ongoing debate, points clearly to the fact that the entities that created this controversy are showing their true colonialist, discriminatory, racist and prejudiced identity by not accepting than an African president can confer an award of this kind.”

It is clear that, when you analyze the facts without any preconception, it’s difficult to arrive at a different conclusion. There are many prizes in all UN institutions including  UNESCO; some of those prizes are named after people from developed as well as from developing countries. Should there be discriminations in applying specific criteria (if they exist)? The answer is no!

What is the reason for singling out Equatorial Guinea in the case of UNESCO if not for discrimination? The position of those targeting President Obiang, can only be explained by ignorance and nations’ disguised non-democratic politics; which is quite regrettable.

If US instead of blindly following France, Spain, or other European countries and had taken into account facts, it would for pure objectivity have voted in favor of keeping the Obiang Prizes and avoided the embarrassment of putting forward a resolution under the pressure of some vocal human rights’ NGOs. Some European countries, instead of taking the lead role and being accused of colonialism and racism, decided to hide behind the United States, which had no colonies and is a well-recognized melting pot with more than 25% of its population Latino and African American.

We still believe that once the US and the majorities of UNESCO Member countries analyze the facts with objectivity they will avoid more embarrassment to UNESCO and maintain the Obiang UNESCO Prize. Let’s give it time.

Dignitaries, politicians and individuals from developed and developing countries are strongly urging President Obiang not to change course, but rather to pursue the efforts his government is making to contribute to the global community and advance the welfare of the citizens of its country and to pursue the far-reaching democratization process which his country has embarked upon (which is bearing fruit) making the Equatorial Guinea one of the most democratic and stable countries on the Continent, and which is building the base for a sound and sustainable economic and social development program, applauded even by the Breton Woods Institutions (the IMF and the World Bank).

From our Correspondent in London, UK.

Category : Business / News

Equatorial Guinea: The Green Revolution

November 11th , 2010 → 12:20 pm @

An important and special thing is happening in Equatorial Guinea.

And soon the country will reach an unprecedented level of self-sufficiency in food production, using revenue from its oil sector, because of a bold approach to revamping driven by Minister of State, Minister of Agriculture and Forests H.E. Teodoro NGUEMA OBIANG MANGUE

The initiative has come to be known as The Green Revolution, and it is borne out of a three-step assessment of the E.G.’s Food, Agriculture and Economic challenges and opportunities. President Obiang Nguema Mbasogo outline the vision in 2007, establishing that by 2020 the nation would be:

“If not a full-fledged developed country, at least an emerging country. This is our dream, and I assume it to also be that of all our compatriots, as it is in the benefit of the whole population.”

Equatorial Guinea, situated in the Gulf of Guinea, is a country of 28,000 km2 with a population estimated at about 1.1 million inhabitants in 2007, projected to be around 1.23 million in 2009; and consists of several geographically distinct areas. As such, projected solutions must respect this diversity and be universally implementable, driving toward the four goals below:

  • reduce poverty through improved health, education and skills development;
  • foster environmentally friendly economic diversification including tourism,  and sustained broad-based growth;
  • develop agriculture, fishery and livestock, as the cornerstones of this diversification and lasting economic development;
  • build supporting infrastructure including information and communication technologies as well as the availability of potable water and sustainable electrical energy.

So the work has begun. You may find more detail about the specific programs that have been implemented (and are planned) by clicking here.

While the challenge is daunting and the goal is aggressive, success will mean reduced rural exodus due to increased opportunity in the country, as well as a reduction in food import and the improved living conditions and income that comes with being a more self-sufficient nation.

This is the dream of the leadership and the entire population. A dream they fully expect to see fulfilled.

Submitted by our correspondent in Houston, TX, USA

Category : 2. See Country Projects / 3. Read Recent News / Agriculture Farming / News / Photos / Politics

Equatorial Guinea News: President Obiang Discusses Development in …

October 30th , 2010 → 11:59 am @

Read more >

Category : News / Politics

Iberia launches “Business Club”, the new seating class for medium-haul flights

October 25th , 2010 → 3:47 pm @

Iberia officially launches its new Business Club class for business travellers on the airline’s longest medium-haul flights.

The first flight equipped with the new seating class takes off today from Madrid to Malabo in Equatorial Guinea. Business Club seats will also be available on flights between Spain and Lagos, Moscow, Tel Aviv, and Cairo.

Read more >

Category : 3. Read Recent News / Travel

Mann returns to ‘advise’ Equatorial Guinea leader

October 24th , 2010 → 12:26 pm @

BRITISH mercenary Simon Mann, has returned to Equatorial Guinea as an adviser to the President he was convicted in 2008 of trying to overthrow.

Read more >

Category : 3. Read Recent News / News

Cronos Airlines – Equatorial Guinea

October 20th , 2010 → 3:56 pm @

Cronos Airlines is a newly established passenger, airline based in Equatorial Guinea. The company recently replaced its leases Embraer Brasilia turboprop with a BAE146-200 leased from Africa Airline Investments.

Category : 3. Read Recent News

Jomo ecstatic with national return

October 15th , 2010 → 2:55 pm @

Misses Popa and enjoyed playing alongside Sox Molwantwa

Mochudi Centre Chiefs striker Moemedi ‘Jomo’ Moatlhaping is happy to have made it back into the senior national team. The former Township Rollers star travelled with the Zebras to Malabo, Equatorial Guinea to play in a friendly match. “I’m very happy to have found my way back in the team, it is an honour for me to be part of the team again,” he said.

Read more >

Category : 3. Read Recent News / Sports